Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:26
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Stock Market Today: Dow Futures Waver Ahead of U.S.-China Trade Talks — Live Updates - WSJ
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
What bait should you use for ocean fishing?
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
China demands sensitive information for rare earth exports, companies warn - Financial Times
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
AMC Theaters to Run Even More Commercials Before Movies Play - Bloomberg.com
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Too often, Black patients get late diagnoses of deadly skin cancer - The Washington Post
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?